• Users Online: 482
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2014  |  Volume : 34  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 238-240

Depressed skull fracture and epidural hematoma resulted from pin-type head holder for craniotomy in children


Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Republic of China

Date of Submission14-May-2014
Date of Decision20-Jun-2014
Date of Acceptance17-Jul-2014
Date of Web Publication30-Oct-2014

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jui Chang Tsai
Department of Surgery, Division of Neurosurgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 7, Zhongshan S. Rd., Zhongzheng Dist., Taipei City 100, Taiwan
Republic of China
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/1011-4564.143654

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

A head fixation device with pins is commonly used for immobilization of the patient's head during craniotomy. The safety of head fixation devices in children has been discussed rarely in the literature. We present one case of depressed skull fractures and associated epidural hematomas resulted from pin-type head holder for craniotomy in young children. The patient received surgical hematoma evacuation and recovered well after the surgery. The incidence of such complications reported in the literature is <0.65%. Age ranged from 2.6 to 7.5 years; all fractures were temporal and occurred during posterior fossa craniotomies. In conclusion, depressed skull fractures and associated epidural hematomas need to be considered as possible complications, while we use the pin-type head holder for craniotomy in children in the daily practice.

Keywords: Skull clamp, skull fractures, epidural hematoma, pin related complication


How to cite this article:
Chen TF, Yang SH, Tsai JC. Depressed skull fracture and epidural hematoma resulted from pin-type head holder for craniotomy in children. J Med Sci 2014;34:238-40

How to cite this URL:
Chen TF, Yang SH, Tsai JC. Depressed skull fracture and epidural hematoma resulted from pin-type head holder for craniotomy in children. J Med Sci [serial online] 2014 [cited 2019 Jun 16];34:238-40. Available from: http://www.jmedscindmc.com/text.asp?2014/34/5/238/143654


  Introduction Top


It is common knowledge among neurosurgeons that head pin fixation devices can cause skull fracture or perforation resulting in an epidural bleeding. This is especially true for pediatric patients in whom a thin skull predisposes to inadvertent skull injury. There are single case reports of air embolism, epidural hematoma, and a tension pneumocephalus related to pin fixation. There are a number of possible explanations for the paucity of reports in the literature: These complications are so common that their clinical importance are underestimated; and others are extremely cautious with the application of the head clamp in children and never thought that such complication would be related or these complications are reluctant to report.


  Case Report Top


This 6-year-old girl presented with 4 months history of intermittent morning headaches and vomiting. She presented to our clinics due to progressive ataxia and unsteady gait for 2 months. Head computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a posterior fossa mass [Figure 1]a with marked ventriculomegaly and the patient underwent a craniotomy for tumor resection. The child was placed in 3-point pin fixation with the Mayfield headrest using pediatric pins tightened to a pressure of 40 lbs. After placing the right side external ventricular drain, the tumor excision followed. During the surgery, the cerebellum was found to be swollen and despite the resection of the tumor and intermittent drainage of cerebrospinal fluid were performed, exposure of the tumor residual was still difficult. Furthermore, intraoperative CO 2 retention was informed. Eventually, partial removal of the tumor was done. No abnormalities were found upon removal of the Mayfield headrest. The patient wake up slowly, and a left-sided hemiparesis was noted. Moreover, decreasing blood hematocrit and refractory shock status developed. Blood components therapy and inotropic agent infusion were prescribed for the acute illness. An emergent CT scan revealed a large right sided epidural hematoma with a depressed fracture of the temporal bone, where the pin had been placed [Figure 1]b and c. Right fronto-temporal-parietal craniotomy for evacuation of the epidural hematoma was performed. After 1 week intensive care, the patient got stable and stationary neurological status presented after the surgery.
Figure 1: (a) Brain magnetic resonance imaging scans revealed a posterior fossa mass. (b and c) A postoperative emergent computed tomography scan revealed a large right sided epidural hematoma (long arrow) with depressed fracture of the temporal bone (short arrow), where the pin had been placed

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In the single reported case series by Lee et al., there were five patients with complications related to the use of the head pin holder. [1] Their age ranged from 3 to 8 years. In another series reported by Vitali and Steinbok, [2] the age range was from 2 years and 7 months to 6 years and 6 months. Furthermore, complications related to the pin head fixation device were related to the presence of a posterior fossa tumor, temporal application of the pins, prolonged surgery, presence of hydrocephalus, and age below 7 years. The most important factor for the skull fracture was the placement of the pin in normal, but relatively thin temporal squama. Based on our experience, if pin fixation is felt necessary, placement of the pins to avoid the temporal squama may avoid such complications.

The risk of the depressed fracture from pin fixation has to be balanced by the benefits of rigid fixation, and the risks of using other head rests, especially for prolonged operations, where there is a risk of skin damage by pressure from a headrest, such as a horseshoe headrest. The gel type of horseshoe headrests do allow prolonged positioning, even in the prone position without pressure necrosis, and if there is concern the head may be lifted periodically during the procedure. Unfortunately, some of them can cause skin pressure sores. [3],[4] Currently, we prefer a simple technique using a U-drape and a horseshoe headrest to stabilize the head in children under 3 years when frameless neuronavigation is being used. [5]

If one is going to use pins in a young child, it may be wise not to push suddenly to set the pins as is often done in adults, but to tighten gently to the planned pressure. A pressure of 40 lbs is generally adequate, and we have even used 30 lbs successfully. If there is a loosening of the head clamp or one hears the sound of a crack as the clamp is being tightened a depressed fracture should be considered. Besides, 4 pin system is more safe then three pin-type according to the previous biomechanical study. [6]

If there have been no clues that a depressed fracture has occurred, one should consider that complication and the associated acute epidural hematoma, if there is unexplained and unexpected persistent hypertension or brain swelling during the operation, just like the illustrated case. In such a situation, checking the pin pressure reading and palpation of the pin sites under the drapes may provide information suggesting the presence of a depressed fracture. This may allow diagnosis prior to the eventual neurological deterioration.

It is not clear from the literature that there is an age above which pin fixations for craniotomy can be considered completely safe. The younger the child, the more concerned one would be about pin fixation, and we now would generally avoid pin fixation under 3 years of age, but it is important to recognize that a 3 years old cut-off is not based on scientific evidence. Indeed, most of the reported complications have occurred in children older than 3 years, which may reflect the fact that most surgeons avoid pins in younger children. Perhaps, if the temporal squama is avoided, pin fixation can be successfully used in children, even under 3 years of age. In such situations, it may be advisable to assess the skull thickness on CT scan before using a skull clamp with pins. [7]


  Conclusion Top


Depressed skull fractures and associated epidural hematomas need to be considered as possible complications of pin fixation of the head for craniotomy in young children. Other possible complications include scalp lacerations, dural lacerations, vascular, and cortical injuries. Alternatives to pin fixation should be considered in the youngest children, especially <3 years of age. When pin fixation is required in young children, simple precautions may reduce the incidence of the complication and awareness of the complication may allow timely diagnosis and intervention.

 
  References Top

1.
Lee M, Rezai AR, Chou J. Depressed skull fractures in children secondary to skull clamp fixation devices. Pediatr Neurosurg 1994;21:174-7.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Vitali AM, Steinbok P. Depressed skull fracture and epidural hematoma from head fixation with pins for craniotomy in children. Childs Nerv Syst 2008;24:917-23.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Aoki N, Sakai T. Modified application of three-point skull clamp for infants. Neurosurgery 1989;25:660-2.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kondziolka D, Adelson PD. Technique of stereotactic biopsy in a 5-month-old child. Childs Nerv Syst 1996;12:615-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Agrawal D, Steinbok P. Simple technique of head fixation for image-guided neurosurgery in infants. Childs Nerv Syst 2006;22:1473-4.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Letts M, Kaylor D, Gouw G. A biomechanical analysis of halo fixation in children. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1988;70:277-9.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Yan HJ. Epidural hematoma following use of a three-point skull clamp. J Clin Neurosci 2007;14:691-3.  Back to cited text no. 7
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Report
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1554    
    Printed32    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded178    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]