|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 4 | Page : 144-149
Personality traits are associated with spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students: A study in a medical sciences university in Iran
Safoura Seifi1, Marzieh Barati Ramyani2, Mahbobeh Faramarzi3, Shima Sum3
1 Oral Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
2 Student Research Committee, Health Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
3 Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Health Research Institute, School of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
|Date of Submission||06-Sep-2017|
|Date of Decision||19-Nov-2017|
|Date of Acceptance||23-Nov-2017|
|Date of Web Publication||27-Jul-2018|
Dr. Mahbobeh Faramarzi
Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Background: Describing the personality traits of medical health students is an essential for understanding their motivation and learning styles and can help plan theoretical and clinical training in this field. Given the dearth of research in this area, the present study was conducted to examine and describe personality traits and spiritual intelligence in medical sciences students and to determine the relationship between these two variables. Methods: This descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted with 240 medical and dental students at Babol University of Medical Sciences selected through simple random sampling. The students completed a demographic questionnaire, the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and the Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale developed by Amram and Dryer. Results: The spiritual intelligence score was higher among dental students than medical students (220.12 ± 78.63 vs. 191.08 ± 65.79) and was higher among women than men (229.27 ± 83.25 vs. 191.89 ± 78.63). The results of the multivariate regression analysis revealed extraversion (β = 0.330) was positively associated with spiritual intelligence. Openness to experience (β = −0.581), agreeableness (β = −0.433), and conscientiousness (β = −0.415) were negatively associated with spiritual intelligence. However, neuroticism was not associated with spiritual intelligence. Conclusions: Some personality traits were associated with spiritual intelligence in Iranian medical and dental students. These findings suggest that improving the spiritual intelligence of medical and dental students requires further attention to personality traits in this group of students.
Keywords: Personality traits, spiritual intelligence, dental students, medical students
|How to cite this article:|
Seifi S, Ramyani MB, Faramarzi M, Sum S. Personality traits are associated with spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students: A study in a medical sciences university in Iran. J Med Sci 2018;38:144-9
|How to cite this URL:|
Seifi S, Ramyani MB, Faramarzi M, Sum S. Personality traits are associated with spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students: A study in a medical sciences university in Iran. J Med Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Mar 24];38:144-9. Available from: http://www.jmedscindmc.com/text.asp?2018/38/4/144/235142
| Introduction|| |
Examining the personality traits of medical and dental students can help identify strategies for increasing the clinical skills of this group. The Big Five personality traits include neuroticism (nervousness, incompatibility, and emotional instability), extraversion (loving others and willingness to participate in social activities), openness (active imagination and productive internal and external experiences), agreeableness (altruism and sympathy) and conscientiousness (dutifulness, punctuality, and accuracy)., Research suggests that personality traits are associated with academic behavior in medical sciences students. Pool et al. have reported that the personality trait openness to experience is associated with students' academic and clinical performance. Recent studies propose that personality traits play a role in the mental health of medical sciences students.
Intelligence refers to a set of tools used to achieve productivity, effectiveness, happiness, satisfaction, and ultimately meaningfulness in life. Intelligence has different dimensions, including cognitive intelligence, emotional intelligence, and spiritual intelligence. Spiritual intelligence is the ability to being holistic harmony of life, being aware of higher planes of spiritual thought, being conscious of spiritual dimensions of daily events, and practicing humility, gratitude and empaty. People with a high spiritual intelligence are more flexible and have a higher consciousness of the self, are more capable of dealing with problems and pain and overcoming them, avoid doing wrong to others, have an integrative thinking, are independent of others, and are less likely to experience depression. Understanding spiritual intelligence as part of the more extensive system of personality sensitizes researchers to the parts of personality to which this intelligence is linked or may help understand its effects. Duffy et al. proposed that spirituality may be related to what individuals value from their work. Moreover, reports indicate a relationship between mental health and spirituality. Certain personality traits are believed to be associated with spirituality and spiritual intelligence. Very few studies have examined the relationship between spiritual intelligence and personality traits. Löckenhoff et al. reported a positive correlation between spirituality and personality traits.
Examining personality traits and spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students is important for several reasons. First, describing the personality traits of medical students is essential for understanding their motivation and learning styles. Second, little research has examined the relationship between personality traits and spiritual intelligence in medical health students. Third, personality traits are effective in predicting medical students' academic and clinical performance. Fourth, familiarity with the personality traits of this group can help them to better plan for their elective courses or take advantage of teaching methods and curricula in line with their personality traits. Finally, familiarity with students' spiritual intelligence can entail the use of spiritual strategies to deal with stress.
The present study, therefore, seeks to examine personality traits and spiritual intelligence in medical health students. It also seeks to answer the question of how personality traits and spiritual intelligence differ between dental and medical students, whether spiritual intelligence and personality traits are associated with gender in dental students, and whether spiritual intelligence can be predicted through personality traits in this group of students.
| Methods|| |
This descriptive, analytical, cross-sectional study was conducted with medical and dental students at Babol University of Medical Sciences. The study population consisted of all the dental and medical students of this university in the academic year 2014–2015. Given the approximately 1500 students meeting these criteria, a sample size of 300 was required as per Morgan and Jersey's table. The researchers randomly distributed 300 questionnaires among the students based on the admissions list. A total of 26 students did not respond to the questionnaires and 34 students partially completed them and were therefore excluded from the study. This left 240 participants (120 dental and 120 medical students) to complete the questionnaire. The data of these students were statistically analyzed. Of the 120 dental students, 30 (25%) were in their first year of school, 28 (23.33%) were in their second year, 23 (19.16%) were in their third year, 17 (14.16%) were in their fourth year, 13 (10.83%) were in their fifth year, and nine (7.5%) were in their sixth year of school. The medical students showed a similar pattern with 31 students (25.83%) in their first year of school, 29 (24.16%) in the second year, 21 (17.50%) in the third year, 19 (15.83%) in the fourth year, 13 (10.83%) in the fifth year, and seven (5.83%) in the sixth year of school.
The data collection tools used in this study included a personality traits questionnaire and a spiritual intelligence questionnaire. A demographic questionnaire was also developed and administered to examine information such as the students' gender, academic year, age, and marital status. The students completed two questionnaires, namely the NEO Five-Factor Inventory and the Integrated Spiritual Intelligence scale. The ethical committee of Babol University of Medical Sciences approved this study (number: MUBOBOL.REC.1394.5).
The NEO Five-Factor Inventory
This questionnaire is a personality test developed based on the factor analysis McCrae and Costa (1992) and consists of 60 items that measure the Big Five personality traits based on a five-point Likert-type scale, including:
- Neuroticism - The tendency to experience negative emotional states such as fear, sadness, embarrassment, nervousness, anger, guilt, and hatred
- Extraversion - An overall high-energy approach within the material and social world made up of traits such as sociability, activeness, assertiveness, and courageousness
- Openness - The elements of an active imagination, an esthetic sense, attention to inner feelings, change-seeking, and intellectual curiosity
- Agreeableness - Altruism, sympathizing with others, eagerness to help and believing in others being helpful
- Conscientiousness - The power to control impulses in a way approved by society, facilitating goal-oriented behavior, reflection before action, delayed gratification, and adherence to rules and norms.
The Integrated Spiritual Intelligence Scale
This scale was developed by Amram and Dryer and consists of 45 items that are scored from one to six (1 point for “never or almost never,” 2 for “very infrequently,” 3 for “somewhat infrequently,” 4 for “somewhat frequently,” 5 for “very frequently,” and 6 for “always or almost always”). The seven general components of the scale include consciousness (awareness, the ability to handle different situations with a high level of awareness, going beyond a simple logical view by seeing others' point of view as well), grace (paying attention to the beauty around us, a sense of appreciation and gratitude, the ability to take satisfaction in daily activities), internal orientation (awareness and understanding about internal values and operating independently of the conditions prevailing in the community), meaning (a deeper sense of purpose and work, making efforts for something beyond material gain, and understanding the meaning of life by serving others), existence and personality (assessment and decision-making based on insights beyond common ideas and becoming knowledgeable through connecting to one's true nature), truth (accepting the truth, knowing about experiences, optimism, and self-acceptance) and transcendence (holiness and purity, empathizing with others, being holy and spiritual and having connection to a sacred power, and practicing to reflect on actions).
Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS version 18 (Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The mean scores of personality traits were compared between the dental and the medical students using independent t-tests. The mean scores of personality traits and spiritual intelligence were compared between male and female medical students using the independent t-test. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to determine the relationship between spiritual intelligence and personality traits. Finally, a multiple hierarchical regression model (MANOVA; enter method) was used to find the predictors of spiritual intelligence. The variables included in the model were those that showed a significant correlation with spiritual intelligence in the previous bivariate association. The criterion or dependent variables were the five dimensions of personality traits.
| Results|| |
Of the total of 240 participants with a mean age of 22.84 (age range: 19–32), 152 participants (63.30%) were male, and 88 (37.70%) were female. [Table 1] presents the means and standard deviations of the scores of the personality traits and spiritual intelligence in the dental and medical students by field of study. The MANOVA showed significantly higher extraversion scores in the dental than the medical students when comparing the means of the Big Five personality traits (P < 0.05). The independent t-test was also used to compare spiritual intelligence in the two groups, and the t-test was significant at the 0.05 level. The descriptive statistics revealed a higher spiritual intelligence in the dental students compared to the medical students (P < 0.01).
|Table 1: Comparison of personality and spiritual quotation between medical and students|
Click here to view
[Table 2] presents the means and standard deviations of the scores of spiritual intelligence and personality traits in the students by gender. The mean of spiritual intelligence was significantly higher in men than women.
|Table 2: Comparison of personality and spiritual intelligence between women and men of medical health students|
Click here to view
As shown in [Table 3], regarding the relationship between gender and personality traits, neuroticism and agreeableness had a significant negative correlation with gender and a significant positive correlation between spiritual intelligence and gender. This table shows that conscientiousness had the highest negative correlation with spiritual intelligence, followed by agreeableness and openness. Extraversion had a significant positive correlation with spiritual intelligence. Finally, neuroticism showed the lowest negative correlation with spiritual intelligence.
|Table 3: Correlation between personality and spiritual intelligence with gender of the students|
Click here to view
The results of the multivariate regression analysis [Table 4] revealed that extraversion (β =0.330) was positively associated with spiritual intelligence in the students. Openness to experience (β = −0.581), agreeableness (β = −0.433), and conscientiousness (β = −0.415) were negatively associated with spiritual intelligence. However, neuroticism was not associated with spiritual intelligence.
|Table 4: Predictors of spiritual intelligence with multiple regression analysis|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
This study was conducted to assess personality traits and spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on the associations between personality traits and spiritual intelligence for medical and dental students. The results show that extraversion is higher in dental students compared to medical students while no significant differences were observed between them in terms of the other four other personality traits, namely neuroticism, openness, conscientiousness, and agreeableness. One study reported similar personality traits in dental and medical students. On contrary, the findings of this study, a study in China showed that introversion is more common in dental students. To explain the present findings, it should be noted that the four personality traits of neuroticism, conscientiousness, agreeableness, and openness may be similar in dental and medical students because the passing grade for the university entrance exam and academic stress  are identical for the two majors and people who study these disciplines tend to have the same personality traits.
The mean score of spiritual intelligence was higher in the dental students than the medical students. A few studies have examined spiritual intelligence in dental or medical students. Two factors explain the higher mean score of spiritual intelligence in the dental students compared to the medical students examined in this study. First, the dental students had a higher mean age than the medical students, and as suggested by Valman, the mean score of spiritual intelligence increases with age. Second, the dental students had higher extraversion compared to the medical students, and as research suggests a positive correlation between spiritual intelligence and extraversion, the higher spiritual intelligence observed in this study in the dental students may be attributed to their extraversion.
The present study showed that neuroticism and agreeableness have a low but significant correlation with gender. The present findings are consistent with the results obtained by some previous research., To explain the present findings, it should be noted that Buss  found that neuroticism and agreeableness have a genetic basis and are the result of compliance for selecting under pressure that differs between the genders. Costa et al. also found that the gender differences observed in neuroticism and agreeableness are rooted in biological and evolutionary factors.
The present study also revealed a correlation between spiritual intelligence and gender in medical health students, as the female dental students had higher spiritual intelligence compared to the male dental students. In the preliminary development and validation of their spiritual intelligence tool, Amram and Dryer showed that gender and spiritual intelligence are connected and that there is a stronger correlation in the case of women. In explaining the findings of the study, it can be argued that the religious culture of Iran has a stronger effect on the daily life of women compared to that of men.
According to the present findings, openness, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were negatively associated with spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students. However, extraversion was not associated with spiritual intelligence. The present findings are inconsistent with those obtained by Saroglou et al., who showed that spirituality is positively correlated with extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, but negatively with neuroticism. On the other hand, one study found no significant relationships between spiritual intelligence and personality traits. In explaining this inconsistency, it can be argued that, unlike the present study, those studies used the ability model of spiritual intelligence and have consequently administered task-based performance tests of spiritual intelligence. The major difference between task-based tests and the self-assessment tests and scales developed to measure spiritual intelligence used in the present study is that the latter have a significant relationship with some personality traits, while performance tests and scales correlate and overlap with tests that assess general intelligence. How can we explain above findings? Very little is known about the relationship between the five-factor models of personality. First, the relationship between spirituality and spirituality with origins as religious behavior is associated with temperament. Second, spirituality may be associated with low openness.
Despite its strengths, the present study has certain limitations. First, a large number of the students (20%) did not respond to our invitation, and this attrition may have affected the conclusion. Second, the study method was correlational, and cause-effect conclusions cannot be drawn. Further studies are recommended to use empirical methods for better understanding the effect of personality traits on spiritual intelligence in dental students.
| Conclusion|| |
Some personality traits were associated with spiritual intelligence in medical and dental students. These findings suggest that improving the spiritual intelligence of medical and dental students requires further attention to personality traits. Medical and dental schools should consider the more dominant personality trait (i.e., extraversion) of their students in devising theoretical and clinical teaching methods and should encourage group rather than individual class participation. A collaborative planning for education and cultural training in dental schools can help improve the academic and clinical performance of medical and dental students. Extraversion and spirituality can be mutually accomplished in medical and dental students by promoting their spiritual intelligence, and a greater improvement in mental, academic, and clinical performance can thus be achieved.
Special thanks to all the students who participated in the study.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was based on a doctoral thesis in general dentistry. The Deputy of Research at Babol University of Medical Sciences approved and supported the study.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Evans JG, Dirks SJ. Relationships of admissions data and measurements of psychological constructs with psychomotor performance of dental technology students. J Dent Educ 2001;65:874-82.
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1992;52:229-37.
Faramarzi M, Kashifard M, Shokri-Noshirvani J. Comparison of some personality traits of patients with functional dyspepsia and healthy individual. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2013;14:57-62.
Poole A, Catano VM, Cunningham DP. Predicting performance in Canadian dental schools: The new CDA structured interview, a new personality assessment, and the DAT. J Dent Educ 2007;71:664-76.
Faramarzi M, Khafri S. Role of alexithymia, anxiety, and depression in predicting self-efficacy in academic students. ScientificWorldJournal 2017;2017:5798372.
Emmons RA. The Psychology of Ultimate Concern; Motivation and Spirituality in Personality. 1st
ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 1999. p. 174.
Mayer J. Spiritual intelligence or spiritual consciousness? Int J Psychol Relig 2000;10:47-56.
McSherry W, Draper P, Kendrick D. The construct validity of a rating scale designed to assess spirituality and spiritual care. Int J Nurs Stud 2002;39:723-34.
Duffy RD, Reid L, Dik BJ. Spirituality, religion, and career development: Implications for the workplace. J Manag Spiritual Relig 2010;7:209-21.
Ahoie KH, Faramarzi M, Hassanzadeh R. The relationship between spiritual intelligence and psychological well-being of women with breast cancer. Shiraz E Med J 2017;18:e15103.
Paunonen SV, Ashton MC. Bing five factors and faces and the prediction of behavior. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;8:524-39.
Löckenhoff CE, Ironson GH, O'Cleirigh C, Costa PT. Five-factor model personality traits, spirituality/religiousness, and mental health among people living with HIV. J Pers 2009;77:1411-36.
Ahoie KH, Faramarzi M, Hassanzadeh R. Psychological well-being of breast cancer patients and its relationship with emotional intelligence. J Babol Univ Med Sci 2017;19:7-14.
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Discriminant validity of NEO-PIR facet scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1992;52:229-37.
Amram Y, Dryer CH. The development and preliminary validation of the integrated spiritual intelligences scale (ISIS). Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Transpersonal Psychology; 2007.
Gilligan JH, Welsh FK, Watts C, Treasure T. Square pegs in round holes: Has psychometric testing a place in choosing a surgical career? A preliminary report of work in progress. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1999;81:73-9.
Wu S, Miao D, Zhu X, Luo Z, Liu X. Personality types of Chinese dental school applicants. J Dent Educ 2007;71:1593-8.
Aghajani Delavar M, Salmalian H, Faramarzi M, Pasha H, Bakhtiari A, Nickpour M, et al
. Using the objective structured clinical examinations in undergranduate midwifery students. Journal of Medicine and Life 2013;6:76-9.
Wolman RN. Thinking with your soul: spiritual intellgennce and why it matters. New York: Harmony Books; 2001. p. 77.
Costa PT, Terracciano A, McCrae RR. Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. J Pers Soc Psychol 2001;81:322-31.
McCrae RR, Terracciano A; Personality Profiles of Cultures Project. Universal features of personality traits from the observer's perspective: Data from 50 cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 2005;88:547-61.
Buss DM. Evolutionary psychology – A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychol Inq 1995;6:1-30.
Saroglou V. Religion and the five factors of personality: A meta-analytic review. Pers Individ Diff 2002;32:15-25.
Lopes PN, Salovey P, Straus R. Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationship. Personality and Individual Differences. 2003;35:641-58.
James W. The Varieties of Religious Experience. New York: Longman; 1902.
[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4]