• Users Online: 732
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Contacts Login 

 Table of Contents  
CASE REPORT
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 39  |  Issue : 5  |  Page : 247-250

Use of bispectral index monitoring to predict the outcome of patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Two case reports


1 Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
2 Department of Anesthesiology, Wanfang Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
3 Department of Anesthesiology, Tri-Service General Hospital and National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan

Date of Submission22-Jan-2019
Date of Decision11-Feb-2019
Date of Acceptance22-Feb-2019
Date of Web Publication08-Mar-2019

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Hou-Chuan Lai
#325, Section 2, Chenggung Road, Neihu 114, Taipei
Taiwan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_18_19

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a reversible neurologic disorder characterized by a variety of symptoms such as seizures, headache, vomiting, altered mental status, and visual disturbances. Bispectral index (BIS) monitor is a kind of electroencephalography and is widely used in anesthesia depth surveillance. In intensive care units, BIS has been used to survey sedation and predict prognosis of coma patients. Here, we report two cases diagnosed radiologically with PRES that had persistent consciousness disturbance resulted from severe life-threatening complications. In our patients, they progressed with different BIS values and different outcomes. We advise that BIS should be used in intensive care as an adjunctive monitor when patients' consciousness status could not be predicted.

Keywords: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome, bispectral index, outcome


How to cite this article:
Wu TS, Liu YT, Wu ZF, Tseng WC, Lai HC. Use of bispectral index monitoring to predict the outcome of patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Two case reports. J Med Sci 2019;39:247-50

How to cite this URL:
Wu TS, Liu YT, Wu ZF, Tseng WC, Lai HC. Use of bispectral index monitoring to predict the outcome of patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: Two case reports. J Med Sci [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 15];39:247-50. Available from: http://www.jmedscindmc.com/text.asp?2019/39/5/247/253799


  Introduction Top


Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurological disorder and presented by a variety of neurological signs and symptoms, including headache, visual disturbance, consciousness problems, seizures, focal neurological deficits, and it mostly happens in female patients.[1] It is usually associated with preeclampsia/eclampsia, solid-organ transplant procedures, autoimmune diseases, and immunosuppressive agents with few cases reported caused by blood transfusion.[2],[3] Recent studies have reported that PRES-associated mortality was 5%–19% and there were severe functional impairments in 36%–44% of patients.[4]

Electroencephalogram such as bispectral index (BIS) monitoring is a widely used clinical technique to monitor depth of anesthesia, prevent awareness and postoperative delirium, and affect surgical morbidity.[5],[6],[7] Besides, it is used in the intensive care unit (ICU) for sedative surveillance [8] and can be used for prediction of the prognosis of ischemic stroke patients.[9]

To the best of our knowledge, there is no study describing the use of BIS for predicting the neurological prognosis of PRES. Here, we report two PRES cases using BIS to assess consciousness status.


  Case Reports Top


Case 1

A 31-year-old female without remarkable medical history was presented with abdominal pain, persistent vaginal bleeding, shortness of breath, and general weakness after normal spontaneous delivery. Under the diagnosis of postpartum hemorrhage, emergent operation was performed to repair perineal laceration wound, and 2500 ml blood loss was recorded. She underwent bilateral internal iliac arterial embolization following surgery, and she was sent to the ICU postoperatively. In the ICU, she lost 5700 ml of blood again even after resuscitation.

Her blood pressure highest up to 180/100 mmHg was noted since day 7 and consciousness became stupor even after flumazenil using. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed vasogenic edema over cortical and subcortical regions of bilateral occipital, parietal, frontal lobes, and bilateral cerebellum. PRES was diagnosed [Figure 1]. Labetalol and nicardipine were given for controlling hypertension. On day 17, her consciousness remained stupor (E3-4M4-5VT). We put a BIS monitor on her and the values were around 35–89 without burst suppression (BS) under propofol sedation. We adjusted the dosage of propofol for sedation to keep BIS around 70.[10] On day 23, tracheostomy was performed due to persistent consciousness stupor and failure to weaning ventilator.
Figure 1: Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed patchy T2 hyperintensity over cortical and subcortical regions of bilateral occipital, parietal, frontal lobes, and bilateral cerebellum are noted

Click here to view


On day 27, she received total abdominal hysterectomy due to uterine rupture with intra-abdominal sepsis. On day 30, she received exploratory laparotomy to check bleeding and ligation of bilateral internal iliac arteries and right infundibulopelvic ligamental vessel, with plenty of blood and blood clot about 3100 ml over peritoneal and pelvic space. On day 35, BIS values were around 70–85. Fortunately, on day 37, her consciousness became alert, tracheostomy was removed on day 40, and she was discharged without residual neurological deficit.

Case 2

A 33-year-old female who just normal spontaneously delivered her first baby was admitted due to yellow skin turgor and tea color urine. During hospitalization, disseminated intravascular coagulation, liver and renal function impairment, and jaundice were noted. She was suspected for hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet syndrome accompanied with fulminant hepatitis B flaring up with decompensated liver failure. She received plasma exchange for three times but in vain.

On day 3, she became comatose with seizure attack, and brain image showed PRES [Figure 2], and her condition deteriorated rapidly. On day 7, she received emergent living donor-liver transplantation under total intravenous anesthesia,[11] and the BIS monitor showed 10–20 and BS ratio around 98%–100% during operation. In ICU, the BIS monitor showed 10–20 and BS ratio around 98%–100% after surgery. In the early morning of day 8, liver function test and her renal function improved, she regained consciousness, and the BIS showed 85 without BS. Unfortunately, on day 9, the BIS value dropped to 2 and BS ratio 98% while 1350 ml fresh bloody discharge from the surgical drainage was noted. We kept fluid resuscitation with colloid and blood and emergent exploratory laparotomy to check bleeding was performed immediately. Pupil dilatation from 2 to 8 mm without light reflex and absent both gag reflex and painful stimulants response were noted, and the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) was E1-M1-VT. Brain MRI showed multifocal intracranial hemorrhage, severe brain/cerebellum swelling, uncal herniation, and brainstem compression. The BIS monitor showed 0–1 and BS ratio around 98%–100%. The risk of neurosurgical intervention was high and supportive treatment was suggested. She expired on day 11.
Figure 2: Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed diffuse symmetrical hyperintensities on T2-weighted image in bilateral occipital lobes, primarily in the cortical regions with cytotoxic and vasogenic edema

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


In our patients, the outcome from survival to death and the corresponding BIS value was >75 and 0. In our cases, multiple comorbidities such as decompensated liver failure, sepsis, and hemorrhagic shock made it difficult to assess neurologic function and prognosis. Our first patient woke up and BIS value was higher than 75 on the 31st postoperative day as an acceptable course of blood transfusion-induced PRES and the neurologic outcome was fair. For the second patient, we have known that solid-organ transplantation, further immunosuppressant, and blood transfusion are the main risk factors for PRES.[2] The BIS values also were consistent with MRI and clinical neurological signs.

BIS values were significantly different between patients who recovered consciousness and those with poor neurologic outcome. Fàbregas et al.[9] have reported that the maximal BIS value was 52.3 and 69 associated with a probability of 0.5 and 0.9 of recovering consciousness, respectively, in severe brain injury patients without sedation. In addition, an abnormal BIS trace was strongly associated with poor neurologic outcome in patients with severe ischemic-hypoxic brain injury undergoing emergency surgery and that a normal BIS value could indicate that patients are more likely to survive with a good neurologic outcome was reported.[12] Miao et al.[13] also reported that the mortality rate was significantly lower in patients with a BIS value >32.5 than in patients with a BIS value of ≤32.5 within 2 weeks in coma patients. In a 171-patient study, those with a BIS <10 suffered 91% overall mortality while BIS >20 was associated with 36% overall mortality.[14] Besides, Mahmood et al. reported that 44 patients with severe traumatic brain injury worsened to brain death, and their respective BIS values progressively decreased to 0.[15] Park et al.[16] have reported that the mean BIS values of the good outcome and poor outcome were 35.6 and 5.5, respectively, in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients during early targeted temperature management. These reports demonstrated that the greater BIS value was, the better patient's mental status and outcome would be.[17] Accordingly and as our cases, BIS may be a noninvasive, objective, and convenient method to predict neurological outcomes.[18]

BIS monitor was not designed as a monitor of neurologic outcome during intensive care. Because there are many confounding factors that may affect our interpretation, caution is needed while using BIS under these circumstances. There are situations that BIS may be falsely low, such as hypothermia, use of sedative drugs, and neuromuscular blockade medication.[9] On the other hand, the appearance of paradoxical electroencephalograph delta rhythm and artifacts from the pulsations of temporal artery or movements of the eyes or head, pacemakers, use of external rewarming devices, and catecholamine infusions may result in an increase of BIS values.[19],[20] In addition, seizures also affect BIS monitoring with higher or lower value.[14]


  Conclusion Top


Our case reports suggest that BIS monitoring provides useful prognostic information in PRES patients. There is evidence of its use as a prognostic tool, but decisions should not be made on BIS values alone. Further investigation is necessary.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Fischer M, Schmutzhard E. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. J Neurol 2017;264:1608-16.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Tseng WC, Lai HC, Yeh CC, Fan HL, Wu ZF. Overdose of tacrolimus as the trigger causing progression of posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome and subsequent hepatic infarction after liver transplant: A case report. Exp Clin Transplant 2018. doi:10.6002/ect.2017.0255. [Epub ahead of print].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Cevallos CA, Berman BS. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome after blood transfusion. J Neurol Sci 2016;367:245-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Hinduja A, Habetz K, Raina S, Ramakrishnaiah R, Fitzgerald RT. Predictors of poor outcome in patients with posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Int J Neurosci 2017;127:135-44.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
MacKenzie KK, Britt-Spells AM, Sands LP, Leung JM. Processed electroencephalogram monitoring and postoperative delirium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesthesiology 2018;129:417-27.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Messina AG, Wang M, Ward MJ, Wilker CC, Smith BB, Vezina DP, et al. Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;10:CD007272.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Petsiti A, Tassoudis V, Vretzakis G, Zacharoulis D, Tepetes K, Ganeli G, et al. Depth of anesthesia as a risk factor for perioperative morbidity. Anesthesiol Res Pract 2015;2015:829151.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Shetty RM, Bellini A, Wijayatilake DS, Hamilton MA, Jain R, Karanth S, et al. BIS monitoring versus clinical assessment for sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in the intensive care unit and its impact on clinical outcomes and resource utilization. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2018;2:CD011240.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Fàbregas N, Gambús PL, Valero R, Carrero EJ, Salvador L, Zavala E, et al. Can bispectral index monitoring predict recovery of consciousness in patients with severe brain injury? Anesthesiology 2004;101:43-51.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Lai HC, Lee MS, Lin SL, Chow LH, Lin BF, Wu ZF. The optimal effect-site concentration of propofol for endotracheal suctioning in intensive care unit patients. J Med Sci 2017;37:1-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
  [Full text]  
11.
Lai HC, Hung NK, Lin BF, Chen JL, Huang YH, Wu ZF. Lower incidence of prolonged extubation in propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia compared with desflurane anesthesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A retrospective study. J Med Sci 2019. doi:10.4103/jmedsci.jmedsci_157_18. (In Press).  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Myles PS, Daly D, Silvers A, Cairo S. Prediction of neurological outcome using bispectral index monitoring in patients with severe ischemic-hypoxic brain injury undergoing emergency surgery. Anesthesiology 2009;110:1106-15.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Miao W, Zhang Y, Li H. Bispectral index predicts deaths within 2 weeks in coma patients, a better predictor than serum neuron-specific enolase or S100 protein. J Anesth 2013;27:855-61.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Seder DB, Dziodzio J, Smith KA, Hickey P, Bolduc B, Stone P, et al. Feasibility of bispectral index monitoring to guide early post-resuscitation cardiac arrest triage. Resuscitation 2014;85:1030-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Mahmood S, El-Menyar A, Shabana A, Mahmood I, Asim M, Abdelrahman H, et al. Bispectral index as a predictor of unsalvageable traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj 2017;31:1382-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Park JH, Oh JH, Choi SP, Wee JH. Neurologic outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest could be predicted with the help of bispectral-index during early targeted temperature management. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2018;26:59.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Dou L, Gao HM, Lu L, Chang WX. Bispectral index in predicting the prognosis of patients with coma in intensive care unit. World J Emerg Med 2014;5:53-6.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Fyntanidou B, Grosomanidis V, Aidoni Z, Thoma G, Giakoumis M, Kiurzieva E, et al. Bispectral index scale variations in patients diagnosed with brain death. Transplant Proc 2012;44:2702-5.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Andrzejowski J, Sleigh JW, Johnson IA, Sikiotis L. The effect of intravenous epinephrine on the bispectral index and sedation. Anaesthesia 2000;55:761-3.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Gallagher JD. Pacer-induced artifact in the bispectral index during cardiac surgery. Anesthesiology 1999;90:636.  Back to cited text no. 20
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Case Reports
Discussion
Conclusion
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed421    
    Printed49    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded71    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]