|Year : 2020 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 83-87
Double extremes of brain tumors – Dilemma of decision-making and pitfalls of image: A case report and literature review
Kun-Ting Hong, Yi Wan, Chi-Tun Tang
Department of Neurological Surgery, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
|Date of Submission||06-Sep-2018|
|Date of Decision||21-May-2019|
|Date of Acceptance||27-Sep-2019|
|Date of Web Publication||25-Nov-2019|
4F, No. 325, 2nd Section, Cheng-Kung Road, Neihu District, Taipei City
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
Coexistence of multiple primary intracranial tumors has been reported previously. However, most of simultaneous tumors occurred after intracranial radiotherapy or in high association with heredity. Both primary intracranial tumors arising simultaneously at synchronous discrete sites were introduced without prior radiation or genetic disorders. These tumors showed the same characteristic according to preoperative images. Two distinct tumors, meningioma and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma were revealed by postoperative histopathological findings. We present this unusual case to exhibit the rare possibility that two distinct primary brain tumors can occur in the same patient. Although magnetic resonance image were used to define the tumor patterns in almost cases, some diagnostic pitfalls may occur with coexistent primary brain tumors. Hence, a discrepancy between clinical impressions and radiological findings should raise a further survey for potential different natures. Reviewing the literature, we should remove the symptomatic tumors based on mass effect and presenting symptoms first, whether it is a benign-looking meningioma or a malignant astrocytoma. Surgical priority for two distinct synchronous tumors from each other needs individual evaluation carefully.
Keywords: Meningioma, anaplastic oligoastrocytoma, radiotherapy, chromosome 1p and 19q, p53, receptor tyrosine kinases
|How to cite this article:|
Hong KT, Wan Y, Tang CT. Double extremes of brain tumors – Dilemma of decision-making and pitfalls of image: A case report and literature review. J Med Sci 2020;40:83-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Hong KT, Wan Y, Tang CT. Double extremes of brain tumors – Dilemma of decision-making and pitfalls of image: A case report and literature review. J Med Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Apr 1];40:83-7. Available from: http://www.jmedscindmc.com/text.asp?2020/40/2/83/271510
| Introduction|| |
The simultaneous occurrence of multiple primary intracranial tumors has been reported previously. However, most of these tumors occurred after cranial radiotherapy,, or in high association with family heredity. The incidence of different histological types of primary brain tumors is about 0.3% of all brain tumors. Courville reported that incidence of multiple gliomas account for 4.3% of intracranial tumors. Cushing reported a case of malignant gliomas adjacent to benign meningiomas. Subsequently, Fisher reported meningioma and malignant glioma appearing in the same patient and summarized cases since 1910. Double extremes tumors of different pathology without genetic disorders or intracranial radiotherapy are very uncommon. Moreover, several authors already published that meningiomas and gliomas are the most common simultaneously primary intracranial tumors by statistical analysis.,,,,,, However, concurrent occurrence of meningioma and anaplastic oligoastrocytoma (AO), WHO Grade III at synchronous discrete sites without radiation or genetic disorders are rare case as we know. Spallone et al. reported that recognition of one intracranial lesion may miss other coexistent brain lesions easily. Several possible hypotheses had been proposed to explain this situation. Nestler et al. revealed the result of comparative genomic hybridization and chromosome analysis in two patients who presented with concurrent meningioma and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Chromosome and genetic testing of tumor cells should be performed routinely when different histological types of brain tumors are present. Reviewing the literature, surgical priority for two distinct synchronous tumors needs individual consideration carefully. We should remove the symptomatic tumors based on progressive larger size and mass effect first, whether it is a benign-looking or less malignant tumors.,
| Case History|| |
The 39-year-old female experienced disorganized behavior without weakness of limb for 1 week before admission. After checking hemogram and electrolyte, computed tomography (CT) of brain without contrast [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b was arranged which showed two hyperdense lesions over the left frontal and parietal lobes. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain revealed two distinct extra-axial tumors of the left frontal and parietal lobes [Figure 1]d and [Figure 1]e. These tumors showed the same characteristic according to preoperative gadolinium-enhanced MRI and CT of the brain. According to symptomatic frontal tumors with mass effect, the left frontal tumor was totally removed and surgical histopathological findings confirmed the diagnosis of meningioma [Figure 2] while the smaller one waited for observation. Six months later, she presented with severe headache and right-sided hemiparesis (MP: 3/5). Follow-up brain CT [Figure 1]c and brain MRI [Figure 1]f demonstrated progression of the smaller lesion was with central necrosis and surrounding edema. A second craniotomy with total removal of tumor was performed and postoperative histopathological findings confirmed the AO, WHO Grade III [Figure 3]. After secondary surgery, she was gradually recovery without new neurological deficits. Although magnetic resonance image were used to define the tumor patterns in almost cases, some diagnostic pitfalls may occur with coexistent tumors. Discrepancy between clinical impression and radiological findings should raise a further survey for potential lesions of different natures.
|Figure 1: (a and b) Noncontrast computed tomography of brain showed two high-density lesion over left frontal and left parietal lobe; (d and e) Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging revealed two homogenous enhanced lesion of the left frontal and parietal lobe; (c and f) Six months later, non contrast computed tomography and gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated progression of the previous left parietal lesion with central necrosis and surrounding edema|
Click here to view
|Figure 2: (a) Histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of the left frontal tumor is a meningioma, WHO Grade I, which shows typically syncytial and whorl-like growth pattern with occasional psammoma bodies (white arrow). In immunohistochemical studies, it reveals positive reactivity to antiendomysial antibody (b), but negative to antiglial fibrillary acidic protein (c). Furthermore, the Ki-67 of this tumor is around 2-3% (d) indicates its low proliferation index and should be classified as WHO Grade I|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Pathology of the left parietal lesion reveals an anaplastic oligoastrocytoma, WHO Grade III, characterized by mixed oligodendrocytic components (a), relative round and vesicular nuclei with perinuclear halo and astrocytic components (b), irregular and hyperchromatic nuclei with eccentrically located nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Figure (a) showed increased mitotic figures (white arrow) and endothelial proliferation (big white arrow). In immunoreactivity to antiglial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocytic component (d) compares to the oligodendroglial region (c), that confirms this tumor's separate components|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Possible pathophysiology of concurrent intracranial tumor of distinct origins
Several authors have published simultaneous intracranial tumors of both mesenchymal and neuroepithelial origin.,8],,19], Concurrent meningioma and gliomas were also reported,,,,,,,,, and meningioma and glial tumor were the most common coexistent primary brain tumor.,,,,,, Most of these coexistent tumors occurred after cranial radiotherapy,, or in high association with heredity. Mechanism of radiation-related neoplasms is multifactor and we still do not understand well. However, radiation takes an important part in not only treatment of tumor but also a potential risk factor of cancer. Ionizing radiation has also been hypothesized and was a risk factor of glioma formation.,,,,,,,
Cellular genetic background of concurrent intracranial tumors
Neoplastic transformation to astrocytoma form the reactive surrounding meningioma were reported by several authors.,, Therefore, several common abnormalities: signal transduction pathways of GBM and meningioma had been present, including the p53, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), Notch, and Wnt pathways.,,, Neuronal and oligodendroglial differentiation of GBM tissues may be promoted by the abnormal signal transduction pathways, meningioma occurs first, and GBM may be formed by causing p53 dysfunction and RTK activation.,,,, Codeletion of chromosome arms 1p and 19q mainly occurs in oligodendrogliomas and anaplastic oligodendrogliomas, as well as in oligoastrocytomas and AOs. Chromosome t (1p; 19q) is meaning that consequence of an unbalanced translocation between chromosomes 19 and 1. However, chromosome 19q and 1p is a predictive factor of response to chemotherapy as well as radiotherapy. Analysis of chromosomes was used to estimate prognosis and further management of concurrent brain tumors.
When clinical impressions and radiological findings are discrepant, we need further survey for potential different natures. When unpredicted clinical deterioration develops either before or after the removal of intracranial tumor, we never forget possibility of different natures. However, the surgical priority of two distant synchronous tumors needs individual evaluation carefully. We should remove the symptomatic tumors based on progressive larger size and mass effect first, whether it is a benign-looking or a less malignant tumors.,
| Conclusion|| |
We present an analysis of concurrent meningioma and glioma and discussion of mechanism, gene, and treatment modalities. Our case demonstrated the benign and malignant lesions could mask the surgeon's decision based on radiological interpretation. Hence, a discrepancy between clinical impressions and radiological findings was noticed; we must take further survey for potential different natures. Most importantly, we should remove the symptomatic tumors based on mass effect and presenting symptoms first, whether it is a benign-looking meningioma or a less malignant astrocytoma. Chromosome and genetic analysis should be performed routinely when different histological types of brain were diagnosed. Consequently, some diagnostic pitfalls may occur with coexistent primary brain tumors.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Domenicucci M, Artico M, Nucci F, Salvati M, Ferrante L. Meningioma following high-dose radiation therapy. Case report and review of the literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 1990;92:349-52.
Tanaka J, Garcia JH, Netsky MG, Williams JP. Late appearance of meningioma at the site of partially removed oligodendroglioma. Case report. J Neurosurg 1975;43:80-5.
Lee HS, Kim JH, Lee JI. Glioblastoma following radiosurgery for meningioma. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2012;51:98-101.
Schoenberg BS. Multiple primary neoplasms and the nervous system. Cancer 1977;40:1961-7.
Nomura K. Analysis of therapeutic factors related to survival rate for malignant glioma patients – Report from brain tumor registry in Japan, vol 6, 1987. Gan No Rinsho 1989;35:1219-25.
Courville CB. Multiple primary tumors of the brain: Review of the literature and report of twenty-one cases. Am Assoc Cancer Res J1936;26:703.
Cushing H. Meningiomas: Their classification, regional behaviour, life history, and surgical End-results. Canadian Med Assoc J 1938;40:422.
Fisher RG. Intracranial meningioma followed by a malignant glioma. Case report. J Neurosurg 1968;29:83-6.
Kitamura K, Terao H, Kamano S, Nakamura N, Hayakawa I, Ishijima T, et al.
Primary multiple brain tumors. No To Shinkei 1965;17:109-17.
Deen HG Jr., Laws ER Jr. Multiple primary brain tumors of different cell types. Neurosurgery 1981;8:20-5.
Prayson RA, Chowdhary S, Woodhouse S, Hanson M, Nair S. Collision of a syncytial meningioma and malignant astrocytoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2002;6:44-8.
Suzuki K, Momota H, Tonooka A, Noguchi H, Yamamoto K, Wanibuchi M, et al.
Glioblastoma simultaneously present with adjacent meningioma: Case report and review of the literature. J Neurooncol 2010;99:147-53.
Spallone A, Santoro A, Palatinsky E, Giunta F. Intracranial meningiomas associated with glial tumours: A review based on 54 selected literature cases from the literature and 3 additional personal cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1991;110:133-9.
Lee EJ, Chang CH, Wang LC, Hung YC, Chen HH. Two primary brain tumors, meningioma and glioblastoma multiforme, in opposite hemispheres of the same patient. J Clin Neurosci 2002;9:589-91.
Strong AJ, Symon L, MacGregor BJ, O'Neill BP. Coincidental meningioma and glioma. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg 1976;45:455-8.
Davis GA, Fabinyi GC, Kalnins RM, Brazenor GA, Rogers MA. Concurrent adjacent meningioma and astrocytoma: A report of three cases and review of the literature. Neurosurgery 1995;36:599-604.
Nestler U, Schmidinger A, Schulz C, Huegens-Penzel M, Gamerdinger UA, Koehler A, et al.
Glioblastoma simultaneously present with meningioma – Report of three cases. Zentralbl Neurochir 2007;68:145-50.
Shuangshoti S, Netsky MG, Jane JA. Neoplasms of mixed mesenchymal and neuroepithelial type. With consideration of the relationship between meningioma and neurilemmoma. J Neurol Sci 1971;14:277-91.
Shuangshoti S, Panyathanya R. Neoplasm of mixed mesenchymal and neuroepithelial origin of the optic nerve. Br J Ophthalmol 1977;61:390-3.
Malhotra V, Beohar PC, Paul DN, Kumar S. Meningioma in association with astrocytoma – A case report. Indian J Cancer 1983;20:86-8.
Rotondo M, Parlato C, Zotta DC, Moraci A. Simultaneous multiple brain tumors of different histological nature. Report of two cases. J Neurosurg Sci 1990;34:57-60.
Marra A, Ramponi G, Grimaldi G. Simultaneous occurrence of right supratentorial meningioma and glioblastoma multiforme. Case report. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1977;36:83-91.
Goyal A, Singh AK, Sinha S, Tatke M, Singh D, Gupta V. Simultaneous occurrence of meningioma and glioma in brain: Report of two cases. J Clin Neurosci 2003;10:252-4.
Dario A, Marra A, Cerati M, Scamoni C, Dorizzi A. Intracranial meningioma and astrocytoma in the same patient. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci 1995;39:27-35.
Bondy ML, Scheurer ME, Malmer B, Barnholtz-Sloan JS, Davis FG, Il'yasova D, et al.
Brain tumor epidemiology: Consensus from the brain tumor epidemiology consortium. Cancer 2008;113:1953-68.
Maiuri F, Cappabianca P, Iaconetta G, Esposito F, Messina A. Simultaneous presentation of meningiomas with other intracranial tumours. Br J Neurosurg 2005;19:368-75.
Vaquero J, Coca S, Martínez R, Jiménez C. Convexity meningioma and glioblastoma in collision. Surg Neurol 1990;33:139-41.
Black PM, Carroll R, Glowacka D, Riley K, Dashner K. Platelet-derived growth factor expression and stimulation in human meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1994;81:388-93.
Wen PY, Kesari S. Malignant gliomas in adults. N
Engl J Med 2008;359:492-507.
Amatya VJ, Takeshima Y, Inai K. Methylation of p14(ARF) gene in meningiomas and its correlation to the p53 expression and mutation. Mod Pathol 2004;17:705-10.
Al-Khalaf HH, Lach B, Allam A, AlKhani A, Alrokayan SA, Aboussekhra A. The p53/p21 DNA damage-signaling pathway is defective in most meningioma cells. J Neurooncol 2007;83:9-15.
Lusis EA, Chicoine MR, Perry A. High throughput screening of meningioma biomarkers using a tissue microarray. J Neurooncol 2005;73:219-23.
Bromberg JE, van den Bent MJ. Oligodendrogliomas: Molecular biology and treatment. Oncologist 2009;14:155-63.
Jenkins RB, Blair H, Ballman KV, Giannini C, Arusell RM, Law M, et al.
At (1;19)(q10;p10) mediates the combined deletions of 1p and 19q and predicts a better prognosis of patients with oligodendroglioma. Cancer Res 2006;66:9852-61.
Cairncross JG, Ueki K, Zlatescu MC, Lisle DK, Finkelstein DM, Hammond RR, et al.
Specific genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90:1473-9.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]